He is named Christian in the 1860 census and is less than 1 year old. He does not appear in the 1870 census when he would have been aged 10-11. In 1870 there is a Charles, 10 months old.

In 1880 there is a Charley, age 20 in Joshua’s household. Is this person conflated with Christian, who would have been about 20? Or did the census taker just get the age wrong for Charles, who would have been 10-11 in 1880?